Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080335›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

FecalSeq enrichment with RAD Sequencing from non-invasive environmental samples holds promise for genetic monitoring of an imperiled lagomorph.

Amy M Scott, Adrienne I Kovach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy M ScottDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA. amscott@bu.edu.
Adrienne I KovachDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in genomic sequencing and bioinformatics, conservation genomics is still often hindered by a reliance on non-invasive samples. The presence of exogenous DNA and the low quantity and poor quality of DNA in non-invasive samples have been a roadblock to sequencing, thereby limiting the potential for genomic monitoring of endangered species. Recent molecular advances, such as host DNA enrichment, hold promise for facilitating sequencing from non-invasive samples. We used the FecalSeq method to enrich DNA extracted from wild-collected fecal pellets of the imperiled New England cottontail and identified SNPs from 3RAD Sequencing. We obtained SNPs from rabbit pellets, including pellets that were collected in poor environmental conditions and samples that performed poorly with microsatellites. Measures of sequencing success improved with greater amounts of starting DNA and 32% of samples generated SNP genotypes that passed quality control filtering. Genotyping error rates were high, however, and the approach was unable to consistently distinguish unique individuals or matching genotypes, while it was suitable for recovering the expected population structure. Pairing FecalSeq enrichment with RADseq is a promising low-cost method for monitoring wild populations using non-invasive samples in an environmental context, but it may be better suited for informing conservation through population genomics.

Indexed as

FecesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsEndangered SpeciesGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLagomorphaMicrosatellite RepeatsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID39080335
PMCPMC11289273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.