ArticleScientific reports2024
Targeting vascular disrupting agent-treated tumor microenvironment with tissue-penetrating nanotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined treatment of TROP‑2 targeted CAR-T and vascular disruptor CBP enhances anti‑tumor activity in triple‑negative breast cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Biopharmaceuticals for Cancer Treatment: An Update.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Co-administered internalizing RGD peptide boosts anti-PD-L1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Vascular Disruption Therapy as a New Strategy for Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Nanomaterials in cancer starvation therapy: pioneering advances, therapeutic potential, and clinical challenges.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Combination of vascular surgery with novel vascular targeting agents as cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer treatment with vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) causes rapid and extensive necrosis in solid tumors. However, these agents fall short in eliminating all malignant cells, ultimately leading to tumor regrowth. Here, we investigated whether the molecular changes in the tumor microenvironment induced by VDA treatment sensitize the tumors for secondary nanotherapy enhanced by clinical-stage tumor penetrating peptide iRGD. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and breast cancer mice with VDA combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P) resulted in upregulation of the iRGD receptors αv-integrins and NRP-1, particularly in the peripheral tumor tissue. In PC mice treated with CA4P, coadministration of iRGD resulted in an approximately threefold increase in tumor accumulation and a more homogenous distribution of intraperitoneally administered nanoparticles. Notably, treatment with a combination of CA4P, iRGD, and polymersomes loaded with a novel anthracycline Utorubicin (UTO-PS) resulted in a significant decrease in the overall tumor burden in PC-bearing mice, while avoiding overt toxicities. Our results indicate that VDA-treated tumors can be targeted therapeutically using iRGD-potentiated nanotherapy and warrant further studies on the sequential targeting of VDA-induced molecular signatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.