Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080292›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2024

Investigating the response of the butyrate production potential to major fibers in dietary intervention studies.

Thao Van-Wehle, Marius Vital

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Digestion-resistant proteins support the healthy metabolite profiles associated with plant-based diets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thao Van-WehleInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Marius VitalInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. vital.marius@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology) 01GM2204Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 456214861Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (German Center for Infection Research) TTU_06_910 TIPINF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions involving dietary fibers are known to benefit host health. A leading contribution of gut microbiota is commonly recognized with production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) suspected to play a key role. However, the detailed mechanisms are largely unknown, and apart from a well-described bifidogenic effect of some fibers, results for other bacterial taxa are often incongruent between studies. We performed pooled analyses of 16S rRNA gene data derived from intervention studies (n = 14) based on three fibers, namely, inulin-type fructans (ITF), resistant starch (RS), and arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS), harmonizing the bioinformatics workflow to reveal taxa stimulated by those substrates, specifically focusing on the SCFA-production potential. The results showed an increased butyrate production potential after ITF (p < 0.05) and RS (p < 0.1) treatment via an increase in bacteria exhibiting the enzyme butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase (but) that was governed by Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes (ITF) and Agathobacter (RS) respectively. AXOS did not promote an increase in butyrate producers, nor were pathways linked to propionate production stimulated by any intervention. A bifidogenic effect was observed for AXOS and ITF, which was only partly associated with the behavior of but-containing bacteria and largely represented a separate response. Low and high Ruminococcus abundances pre-intervention for ITF and RS, respectively, promoted an increase in but-containing taxa (p < 0.05) upon interventions, whereas initial Prevotella abundance was negatively associated with responses of butyrate producers for both fibers. Collectively, our data demonstrate targeted stimulation of specific taxa by individual fibers increasing the potential to synthesize butyrate, where gut microbiota composition pre-intervention strongly controlled outcomes.

Indexed as

BacteriaButyratesDietary FiberGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SXylansCoenzyme A-TransferasesComputational BiologyFaecalibacteriumFatty Acids, VolatileHumansInulinOligosaccharidesStarcharabinoxylanButyratesbutyryl-CoA acetoacetate CoA transferaseCoenzyme A-TransferasesDietary FiberFatty Acids, VolatileInulinOligosaccharidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStarchXylans

Identifiers

PMID39080292
PMCPMC11289085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.