Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080288›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Nuclear accumulation of rice UV-B photoreceptors is UV-B- and OsCOP1-independent for UV-B responses.

Shan Hu, Yihan Chen, Chongzhen Qian, Hui Ren, Xinwen Liang, Wenjing Tao, Yanling Chen, Jue Wang, Yuan Dong, Jiupan Han and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in CRISPR Plant Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shan HuState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yihan ChenState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Chongzhen QianState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hui RenState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xinwen LiangState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Wenjing TaoState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yanling ChenState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jue WangState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuan DongState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jiupan HanState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xinhao OuyangState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. ouyangxinhao@xmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6141-3501
Xi HuangState Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. xihuang@xmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1898-6918

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32070266National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32122011National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32270250Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation) 2021J02011Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation) 2022J02004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, the conserved plant-specific photoreceptor UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) perceives ultraviolet-B (UV-B) light and mediates UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis and stress acclimation. In this study, we reveal that UV-B light treatment shortens seedlings, increases stem thickness, and enhances UV-B stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa) via its two UV-B photoreceptors OsUVR8a and OsUVR8b. Although the rice and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) UVR8 (AtUVR8) photoreceptors all form monomers in response to UV-B light, OsUVR8a, and OsUVR8b function is only partially conserved with respect to AtUVR8 in UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis and stress acclimation. UV-B light and CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) promote the nuclear accumulation of AtUVR8; by contrast, OsUVR8a and OsUVR8b constitutively localize to the nucleus via their own nuclear localization signals, independently of UV-B light and the RING-finger mutation of OsCOP1. We show that OsCOP1 negatively regulates UV-B responses, and shows weak interaction with OsUVR8s, which is ascribed to the N terminus of OsCOP1, which is conserved in several monocots. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis demonstrates that UV-B-responsive gene expression differs globally between Arabidopsis and rice, illuminating the evolutionary divergence of UV-B light signaling pathways between monocot and dicot plants.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCell NucleusGene Expression Regulation, PlantOryzaPlant ProteinsUltraviolet RaysArabidopsis ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneMutationPhotoreceptors, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedSeedlingsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesArabidopsis ProteinsAT2G32950 protein, ArabidopsisChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistonePhotoreceptors, PlantPlant ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUvr8 protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID39080288
PMCPMC11289442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.