ArticleNature communications2024
Quantitative 3D structural analysis of small colloidal assemblies under native conditions by liquid-cell fast electron tomography.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic questions in aqueous-organic chemistry.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026Review
- Mn(II)-Tagged DOTA-Modified Sugar-Based Biopolymers as Gadolinium-Free Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Zooming into Disease at the Nanoscale: High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy in Biomedical Discovery.ACS nano · 2026Review
- Curvature-Directed Patch Formation on Gold Nanocubes by Thermally Induced Polymer Redistribution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- MDT: A simple tool to facilitate dropcasting onHardwareX · 2025Article
- Aqueous Colloidal Perovskite Quantum Emitters.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Pushing the Frontiers: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Guided Programmable Concepts in Binary Self-Assembly of Colloidal Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Imaging of Hydrated and Living Cells in Transmission Electron Microscope: Summary, Challenges, and Perspectives.ACS nano · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electron tomography has become a commonly used tool to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) structure of nanomaterials, including colloidal nanoparticle assemblies. However, electron microscopy is typically done under high-vacuum conditions, requiring sample preparation for assemblies obtained by wet colloid chemistry methods. This involves solvent evaporation and deposition on a solid support, which consistently alters the nanoparticle organization. Here, we suggest using electron tomography to study nanoparticle assemblies in their original colloidal liquid environment. To address the challenges related to electron tomography in liquid, we devise a method that combines fast data acquisition in a commercial liquid-cell with a dedicated alignment and reconstruction workflow. We present the advantages of this methodology in accurately characterizing two different systems. 3D reconstructions of assemblies comprising polystyrene-capped Au nanoparticles encapsulated in polymeric shells reveal less compact and more distorted configurations for experiments performed in a liquid medium compared to their dried counterparts. A similar expansion can be observed in quantitative analysis of the surface-to-surface distances of self-assembled Au nanorods in water rather than in a vacuum, in agreement with bulk measurements. This study, therefore, emphasizes the importance of developing high-resolution characterization tools that preserve the native environment of colloidal nanostructures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.