Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080208›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Enhanced 3D dose prediction for hypofractionated SRS (gamma knife radiosurgery) in brain tumor using cascaded-deep-supervised convolutional neural network.

Nan Li, Jinyuan Wang, Yanping Wang, Chunfeng Fang, Yaoying Liu, Chunsu Zhang, Dongxue Zhou, Lin Cao, Gaolong Zhang, Shouping Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Tumor Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Jinyuan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yanping WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Tumor Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Chunfeng FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Tumor Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Yaoying LiuSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, China.
Chunsu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Tumor Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Dongxue ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Tumor Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Lin CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Tumor Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Gaolong ZhangSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, China. zgl@buaa.edu.cn.
Shouping XuSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, China. xusp@cicams.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-9680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a well-established technique in radiation therapy (RT) for treating small-size brain tumors. It administers highly concentrated doses during each treatment fraction, with even minor dose errors posing a significant risk of causing severe damage to healthy tissues. It underscores the critical need for precise and meticulous precision in GKRS. However, the planning process for GKRS is complex and time-consuming, heavily reliant on the expertise of medical physicists. Incorporating deep learning approaches for GKRS dose prediction can reduce this dependency, improve planning efficiency and homogeneity, streamline clinical workflows, and reduce patient lagging times. Despite this, precise Gamma Knife plan dose distribution prediction using existing models remains a significant challenge. The complexity stems from the intricate nature of dose distributions, subtle contrasts in CT scans, and the interdependence of dosimetric metrics. To overcome these challenges, we have developed a "Cascaded-Deep-Supervised" Convolutional Neural Network (CDS-CNN) that employs a hybrid-weighted optimization scheme. Our innovative method incorporates multi-level deep supervision and a strategic sequential multi-network training approach. It enables the extraction of intra-slice and inter-slice features, leading to more realistic dose predictions with additional contextual information. CDS-CNN was trained and evaluated using data from 105 brain cancer patients who underwent GKRS treatment, with 85 cases used for training and 20 for testing. Quantitative assessments and statistical analyses demonstrated high consistency between the predicted dose distributions and the reference doses from the treatment planning system (TPS). The 3D overall gamma passing rates (GPRs) reached 97.15% ± 1.36% (3 mm/3%, 10% threshold), surpassing the previous best performance by 2.53% using the 3D Dense U-Net model. When evaluated against more stringent criteria (2 mm/3%, 10% threshold, and 1 mm/3%, 10% threshold), the overall GPRs still achieved 96.53% ± 1.08% and 95.03% ± 1.18%. Furthermore, the average target coverage (TC) was 98.33% ± 1.16%, dose selectivity (DS) was 0.57 ± 0.10, gradient index (GI) was 2.69 ± 0.30, and homogeneity index (HI) was 1.79 ± 0.09. Compared to the 3D Dense U-Net, CDS-CNN predictions demonstrated a 3.5% improvement in TC, and CDS-CNN's dose prediction yielded better outcomes than the 3D Dense U-Net across all evaluation criteria. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed CDS-CNN model outperformed other models in predicting GKRS dose distributions, with predictions closely matching the TPS doses.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerRadiosurgeryDeep LearningHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedBrain cancerContextual informationConvolutional neural networkDose predictionGamma knife radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID39080208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.