ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
Variable-density velocity-selective magnetization preparation for non-contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Velocity-selective (VS) magnetization preparation has shown great promise for non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with the ability to generate positive angiographic contrast directly using a single 3D acquisition. However, existing VS-MRA methods have an issue of aliased saturation around a certain velocity, known as velocity field-of-view (vFOV), which can cause undesired signal loss in arteries. This study aimed to develop a new version of the VS preparation pulse sequence that overcomes the aliased saturation problem in conventional VS preparation. Utilizing the fact that an excitation profile is the Fourier transform of excitation k-space sampling, we sampled the k-space in a non-uniform fashion by scaling gradient pulses accordingly to have aliased excitation diffused over velocity. The variable density sampling function was numerically optimized to maximize the average of the velocity passband signal while minimizing its variance. The optimized variable density VS magnetization was validated through Bloch simulations and applied to peripheral NCE MRA in healthy subjects. The in-vivo experiments showed that the proposed variable density VS-MRA significantly lowered arterial signal loss observed in conventional VS-MRA, as evidenced by a higher arterial signal-to-noise ratio (58.50 ± 14.29 vs. 55.54 ± 12.32; p < 0.05) and improved artery-to-background contrast-to-noise ratio (22.75 ± 7.57 vs. 20.60 ± 6.51; p < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39080207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.