Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080184›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2024

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights from point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) techniques in emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hany A Zaki, Bilal Albaroudi, Eman E Shaban, Mohamed Elgassim, Nood Dhafi Almarri, Kaleem Basharat, Ahmed Shaban

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostic Efficacy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse in Staging of Lower Limb Intramuscular Venous Thrombosis: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intensivist performed compression ultrasound (IPCUS) for screening and early detection of deep venous thrombosis in trauma intensive care unit: a prospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hany A ZakiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Bilal AlbaroudiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. baroudi.bilal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-8394
Eman E ShabanDepartment of Cardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnosis and Treatment, MOH, Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed ElgassimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Nood Dhafi AlmarriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Kaleem BasharatDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmed ShabanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mansoura General Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is clinically difficult diagnosis. The "gold standard test" for DVT diagnosis is venography; however, various point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocols have been suggested for DVT evaluation in the emergency department.

aimsThis review evaluated the role of different POCUS protocols in diagnosing DVT in the emergency department.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based of PRISMA guideline and registered on PROSEPRO (CRD42023398871). An electronic database search in Embase, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google scholar and a manual search were performed to identify eligible studies till February 2023. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Quantitative analysis was carried out using STATA 16 and Review Manager software (RevMan 5.4.1). Sensitivity, specificity of POCUS protocols for DVT diagnosis compared to reference standard test was calculated.

resultsHeterogeneity was identified between 26 included studies for review. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the 2-point POCUS protocol were 92.32% (95% CI: 87.58-97.06), 96.86% (95% CI: 95.09-98.64), 88.41% (95% CI: 82.24-94.58) and 97.25% (95% CI: 95.51-98.99), respectively. Similarly, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for 3-point POCUS were 89.15% (95% CI: 83.24-95.07), 92.71% (95% CI: 89.59-95.83), 81.27% (95% CI: 73.79-88.75), and 95.47% (95% CI: 92.93-98). The data pooled for complete compression ultrasound, and whole-leg duplex ultrasound also resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 98.21-100) and 97.05% (95% CI: 92.25-100), respectively. On the other hand, the time from triage to DVT diagnosis was significantly shorter for emergency physician-performed POCUS than diagnostic tests performed by radiologists.

conclusionThe diagnostic performance of POCUS protocols performed by emergency physicians was excellent. Combined with the significant reduction in time to diagnosis. POCUS can be used as the first-line imaging tool for DVT diagnosis in the emergency department. We also recommended that attending emergency physicians with POCUS training are present during DVT diagnosis to improve diagnostic performance even though high diagnostic performance is observed even with the minimum training.

Indexed as

Deep vein thrombosisDeep venous thrombosisEmergency medicineMeta-analysisPoint-of-care systemsSensitivitySpecificitySystematic reviewUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39080184
PMCPMC11289207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.