ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2024
Volume-Based Quantitative Measurement of [
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra-patient comparison of tracer uptake and biodistribution of [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Complementary roles of 68Ga-FAPI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating IgG4-related disease: a systematic review and pooled analysis.EJNMMI research · 2026Review
- [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Exploratory evaluation of earlyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- [RMD open · 2026Article
- Expanding horizons: radiolabeled FAPI in imaging of autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the potential utility of quantitative parameters obtained by
methodsThis study enrolled patients who underwent [
resultsAmong the patients included in this study, 12 patients met the IgG4-RD classification criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology in 2019. Among them, 8 were males and 4 were females, with an average age of 59.3 ± 11.5 years. 50% of IgG4-RD patients were found with more organ involvement on PET/CT than physical examination, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. IgG4 levels (Rho = 0.594, p = 0.042) and IgG4-RI (Rho = 0.647, p = 0.023) were significantly positively correlated with TL-FAPI. After linear regression analysis, only TL-FAPI showed a predictive value of RI (R
conclusions[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.