ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Role of interaction mode of phenanthrene derivatives as selective PDE5 inhibitors using molecular dynamics simulations and quantum chemical calculations.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors play a crucial role in blocking PDE5 to improve erectile dysfunction (ED). However, most PDE5 drugs revealed side effects including the loss of vision due to the PDE6 inhibition. Phenanthrene derivatives isolated from E. macrobulbon were previously reported as PDE5 inhibitors. Two phenanthrene derivatives (cpds 1-2) revealed better inhibition to PDE5 than PDE6 and cpd 1 is more selective to PDE5 than cpd 2. To elucidate why the phenanthrene derivatives could inhibit PDE5 and PDE6, their binding modes were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations and quantum chemical calculations, as compared to the PDE5 drugs. From the results, all four drugs and phenanthrene derivatives revealed similar π-π interactions to Phe820 in PDE5. Additional H-bond interaction to Gln817 in PDE5 resulted in better PDE5 inhibition of vardenafil and tadalafil. Moreover, cpds 1-2 were able to form the H-bond interaction with Asp764 in PDE5. In the case of the PDE6, the loss of π-π interaction to Phe776 and H-bond interaction to Gln773 indicated the important points for losing the PDE6 inhibition. In conclusion, to develop the new potent PDE5 inhibitors, not only the important interaction with PDE5 but also the interaction with PDE6 should be considered. In phenanthrene derivatives, the middle ring was significant to form π-π interactions to Phe820 in PDE5 and hydroxyl substituent was also the key part to form the H-bond interaction with Asp764 in PDE5. Principal component analysis (PCA) and free energy landscape (FEL) analysis indicated the stability of the system. The bioavailability, drug-likeness, and pharmacokinetics of phenanthrene derivatives were also predicted. These derivatives revealed good drug-likeness and GI absorption. The obtained results showed that phenanthrene derivatives could be interesting for the development of PDE5 inhibitors in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39080154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.