ArticleBehavior research methods2024
An information-theoretic approach to build hypergraphs in psychometrics.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure Guides Function: Beyond Pairwise Neural Interactions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Review
- Complex dynamics in psychological data: Mapping individual symptom trajectories to group-level patterns.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Unveiling Dietary Complexity: A Scoping Review and Reporting Guidance for Network Analysis in Dietary Pattern Research.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Identification of brain-like complex information architectures in embryonic tissue ofCommunicative & integrative biology · 2025Article
- Efficient Search Algorithms for Identifying Synergistic Associations in High-Dimensional Datasets.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Synergistic Perspective on Multivariate Computation and Causality in Complex Systems.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Functional Hypergraphs of Stock Markets.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cognitive modelling of concepts in the mental lexicon with multilayer networks: Insights, advancements, and future challenges.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychological network approaches propose to see symptoms or questionnaire items as interconnected nodes, with links between them reflecting pairwise statistical dependencies evaluated on cross-sectional, time-series, or panel data. These networks constitute an established methodology to visualise and conceptualise the interactions and relative importance of nodes/indicators, providing an important complement to other approaches such as factor analysis. However, limiting the representation to pairwise relationships can neglect potentially critical information shared by groups of three or more variables (higher-order statistical interdependencies). To overcome this important limitation, here we propose an information-theoretic framework to assess these interdependencies and consequently to use hypergraphs as representations in psychometrics. As edges in hypergraphs are capable of encompassing several nodes together, this extension can thus provide a richer account on the interactions that may exist among sets of psychological variables. Our results show how psychometric hypergraphs can highlight meaningful redundant and synergistic interactions on either simulated or state-of-the-art, re-analysed psychometric datasets. Overall, our framework extends current network approaches while leading to new ways of assessing the data that differ at their core from other methods, enriching the psychometrics toolbox, and opening promising avenues for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39080122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.