ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
The New SH3b_T Domain Increases the Structural and Functional Variability Among SH3b-Like CBDs from Staphylococcal Phage Endolysins.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of a Novel T1-like Phage KanT1 Reveals a Standalone SH3 Domain as a Widespread Component ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Characterization of GH18 chitinase in Leishmania braziliensis: expression, structural insights, and implications for vaccine and therapeutic development.Biological research · 2026Article
- Role of the C-terminal modules of Klebsiella phage KP32 receptor-binding protein gp38 in protein and phage functionality.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Isolation and characterization of a novelFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- SPAED: harnessing AlphaFold output for accurate segmentation of phage endolysin domains.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Integrative In Silico and Experimental Characterization of Endolysin LysPALS22: Structural Diversity, Ligand Binding Affinity, and Heterologous Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endolysins, proteins encoded by phages to lyse their hosts and release their progeny, have evolved to adapt to the structural features of each host. The endolysins from Staphylococcus-infecting phages typically feature complex architectures with two enzymatically active domains (EADs) and one cell wall-binding domain (CBD) belonging to the bacterial SH3 (SH3b) superfamily. This study focuses on three SH3b-like CBDs from representative staphylococcal phage endolysins (LysRODI, LysC1C and LysIPLA5) that were structurally and functionally characterized. While RODI_CBD and C1C_CBD were assigned to the well-known SH3_5 family, a new family, SH3b_T (PF24246), was identified using the CBD from LysIPLA5 as a model. GFP-fused CBDs were created to assess their differential binding to a collection of staphylococcal strains. IPLA5_CBD showed enhanced binding to Staphylococcus epidermidis, while RODI_CBD and C1C_CBD exhibited distinct binding profiles, with RODI_CBD targeting Staphylococcus aureus specifically and C1C_CBD displaying broad binding. Sequence comparisons suggested that a few differences in key amino acids could be responsible for the latter binding difference. The CBDs modulated the activity spectrum of synthetic EAD-CBD combinations in accordance with the previous binding profiles, but in a manner that was also dependent on the EAD present in the fusion protein. These results serve as a context for the diversity and versatility of SH3b domains in staphylococcal endolysins, providing insights on how (i) the CBDs from this superfamily have diverged to adapt to diverse bacterial ligands in spite of sharing a common fold; and (ii) the evolution of specificity relies on the EAD-CBD combination rather than solely the CBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.