Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080091›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2024

Overall side effect assessment of oxaliplatin toxicity in rectal cancer patients in NRG oncology/NSABP R04.

John Devin Peipert, Jessica Roydhouse, Mourad Tighiouart, Norah Lynn Henry, Sungjin Kim, Ron D Hays, Andre Rogatko, Greg Yothers, Patricia A Ganz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00058474 (A Clinical Trial Comparing Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin With Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Continuous Intravenous Infusion Of 5-Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin In The Treatment Of Patients With Operable Carcinoma Of The Rectum), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00058474 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Clinical Trial Comparing Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin With Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Continuous Intravenous Infusion Of 5-Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin In The Treatment Of Patients With Operable Carcinoma Of The Rectum

TypeinterventionalSponsorNSABP Foundation IncRan2004 to 2016Enrolled1,608ConditionsColorectal CancerArmscapecitabine, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, radiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John Devin PeipertDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. john.peipert@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-7881
Jessica RoydhouseMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Mourad TighiouartSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Norah Lynn HenryUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sungjin KimSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ron D HaysDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andre RogatkoSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Greg YothersUniversity of Pittsburgh and NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Patricia A GanzDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
The paradoxical roles of beta hydroxy butyrate in the liver pro-metastatic nicheP01CA233452 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI BHOWMICK, NEIL A., LU, SHELLY CHI-LOO · 2020 to 2024
$9.5M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
Advancing Analysis and Interpretation ofAdverse Events and PROs in Cancer Clinical TrialsU01CA232859 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI GANZ, PATRICIA A., TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2018 to 2023
$3.7M
Analysis of ECOG-ACRIN adverse event data to optimize strategies for the longitudinal assessment of tolerability in the context of evolving cancer treatment paradigms (EVOLV)U01CA233169 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI GRAY, ROBERT J, WAGNER, LYNNE I. · 2018 to 2023
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS CTSI UL1 TR001881NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA232859, U01CA233169, P01CA233452-02NCI NIH HHS P01 CA233452NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232859NCI NIH HHS U01 CA233169NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRegulatory guidance suggests capturing patient-reported overall side effect impact in cancer trials. We examined whether the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy differed between oxaliplatin vs. non- oxaliplatin arms in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 trial of stage II-III rectal cancer patients.

methodsThe R-04 neoadjuvant trial compared local-regional tumor control between patients randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine with radiation, with or without oxaliplatin (4 treatment arms). Participants completed surveys at baseline and immediately after chemoradiotherapy. GP5 has a 5-point response scale: "Not at all" (0), "A little bit" (1), "Somewhat" (2), "Quite a bit" (3), and "Very much" (4). Logistic regression compared the odds of reporting moderate-high side effect impact (GP5 2-4) between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not after chemoradiotherapy, controlling for relevant patient characteristics. We examined associations between GP5 and other patient-reported outcomes reflecting side effects.

resultsAnalyses were performed among 1132 study participants. Participants receiving oxaliplatin were 1.58 times (95% CI: 1.22-2.05) more likely to report moderate-high side effect bother at post-chemotherapy/radiation. In both arms, worse overall side effect impact was associated with patient-reported diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (p < 0.01 for all).

conclusionThis secondary analysis of R-04 found that GP5 distinguished between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not as part of their post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, adding patient-centric evidence on the reduced tolerability of oxaliplatin and demonstrating that GP5 is sensitive to known toxicity differences between treatments. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT00058474.

Indexed as

OxaliplatinRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineChemoradiotherapyDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOrganoplatinum CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsCapecitabineFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinCancerClinical trialsFACT GP5Treatment tolerability

Identifiers

PMID39080091
PMCPMC11541265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.