Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080073›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

Review of Sharp Recanalization Techniques in Central Venous Occlusions.

Tony Rizk, Antony Gayed, Stephen Stringfellow, Yara Younan, Ricardo Yamada, Marcelo Guimaraes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sharp recanalization of chronic total venous occlusions using the TipsStar Steerable Cannula.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. [Use of the SurfacerJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tony RizkDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Antony GayedDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Stephen StringfellowDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Yara YounanDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Ricardo YamadaDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Marcelo GuimaraesDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. guimarae@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-7794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benign central venous occlusions are frequently associated with long-term central venous access. Most of these occlusions can be recanalized with conventional endovascular technique. When conventional technique fails, sharp recanalization techniques (SRTs) can increase technical success. The SRTs include single low-profile needles, needle coaxial systems, re-entry catheter, the back end of stiff guidewires, and systems that can deliver radiofrequency energy or laser. This review on SRTs presents technical details and outcomes of the most common techniques used in central venous recanalization.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousEndovascular ProceduresHumansRadiography, InterventionalCentral venous occlusionOutcomesSharp recanalization

Identifiers

PMID39080073
PMCPMC11621131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.