Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080058›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Predicting recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus using artificial intelligence models: a retrospective cohort study.

Min Chen, Weijiao Xu, Yanni Guo, Jianying Yan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min Chen *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Weijiao Xu *Zhangzhou Health Vocational College, Zhangzhou, China.
Yanni Guo *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jianying YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China. yanjy2019@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-5918

Funding

Fujian Provincial Finance Department [2019] No. 827)(2020Y183)the Guide Fund for the Development of Local Science and Technology from the Central Government (2020L3019)the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2020J01338)the Startup Fund for Scientific Research of Fujian Medical University (2019QH1137)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to develop novel artificial intelligence (AI) models based on early pregnancy features to forecast the likelihood of recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before 14 weeks of gestation in subsequent pregnancies.

methodsThis study involved a cohort of 588 women who had two consecutive singleton deliveries and were diagnosed with GDM during the index pregnancy. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were used for feature selection. 5 AI algorithms, namely support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient boosting (LGB), decision tree classifier (DTC), and random forest (RF) classifier, and traditional multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, were employed to construct predictive models for recurrent GDM.

results326 (55.4%) experienced GDM recurrence in subsequent pregnancy. In the training set (67% of the study sample), 13 features were selected for AI models construction. In the testing set (33% of the study sample), the AI models (LGB, RF, and XGB) exhibited outstanding discrimination, with AUROC values of 0.942, 0.936, and 0.924, respectively. The traditional LR model showed moderate discrimination (AUROC = 0.696). LGB, RF, and XGB models also demonstrated excellent calibration, while other models indicated a lack of fit. All AI models showed superior overall net benefits, with LGB, RF, and XGB outperforming the others.

conclusionsThe proposed LGB model demonstrated exceptional accuracy, excellent calibration, and superior overall net benefits. These advancements have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in advising women with a history of GDM and in developing preventive strategies to mitigate the adverse effects on maternal and fetal well-being.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiabetes, GestationalRecurrenceAdultAlgorithmsCohort StudiesDecision TreesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineArtificial intelligenceLight gradient boostingRecurrent gestational diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.