ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Predicting recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus using artificial intelligence models: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Using First-Trimester Laboratory Parameters.Cureus · 2026Article
- AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Women and Child Healthcare: Is AI Able to Change the Beginning of a New Story? A Perspective.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of machine learning models for early prediction of gestational diabetes using retrospective electronic health records from current and previous pregnancies.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to develop novel artificial intelligence (AI) models based on early pregnancy features to forecast the likelihood of recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before 14 weeks of gestation in subsequent pregnancies.
methodsThis study involved a cohort of 588 women who had two consecutive singleton deliveries and were diagnosed with GDM during the index pregnancy. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were used for feature selection. 5 AI algorithms, namely support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient boosting (LGB), decision tree classifier (DTC), and random forest (RF) classifier, and traditional multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, were employed to construct predictive models for recurrent GDM.
results326 (55.4%) experienced GDM recurrence in subsequent pregnancy. In the training set (67% of the study sample), 13 features were selected for AI models construction. In the testing set (33% of the study sample), the AI models (LGB, RF, and XGB) exhibited outstanding discrimination, with AUROC values of 0.942, 0.936, and 0.924, respectively. The traditional LR model showed moderate discrimination (AUROC = 0.696). LGB, RF, and XGB models also demonstrated excellent calibration, while other models indicated a lack of fit. All AI models showed superior overall net benefits, with LGB, RF, and XGB outperforming the others.
conclusionsThe proposed LGB model demonstrated exceptional accuracy, excellent calibration, and superior overall net benefits. These advancements have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in advising women with a history of GDM and in developing preventive strategies to mitigate the adverse effects on maternal and fetal well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39080058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.