ArticleScientific reports2024
Computational study of novel natural agonists targeting farnesoid X receptor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Devices in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Targeting gut-liver-kidney axis: microbiota-derived metabolites and therapeutic implications.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- The SERCA-PLN-DWORF axis in cardiometabolic disease: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a crucial therapeutic target for treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Although obeticholic acid (OCA) as a FXR agonist presents good efficacy, the safety data such as severe pruritus should be carefully considered. To discover new medications, we screen and choose the optimal compounds from ZINC15 database that may agonistically interact with FXR. We utilized the DS19 software to assist us in conducting the computer-aided structure based virtual screening to discover potential FXR agonists. After LibDock scores were determined by screening, their absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity predictions were examined. To determine the binding affinity between the chosen drugs and FXR, molecule docking was utilized. Molecular dynamics simulation was utilized to evaluate the stabilization of the ligand-FXR complex in its native environment. Higher binding affinity and stability with FXR were observed for ZINC000013374322 and ZINC000006036327, as two novel natural compounds, with lower rodent carcinogenicity, Ames mutagenicity, no hepatotoxicity and non-inhibitors of CYP2D6. They could stably exist in the environment, possess favorable potential energy and exert pharmacological effects at lower doses. Furthermore, ZINC000006036327 had lower skin irritancy and sensitization potential compared to OCA, also suggest the possibility of improved skin itching occurrence. ZINC000013374322 and ZINC000006036327 were found to be the best leading compounds to be FXR agonists. They are chosen as safe candidates for FXR target medicine, which play comparable pharmacological effects at lower doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.