ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Liposuction Through an Axillary Fold Incision Combined with a Small Areola Incision to Treat Gynecomastia.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of Ultrasonography in Perioperative Management of Suction-Assisted Lipectomy for Gynecomastia: A Prospective Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecomastia is a progressive disease characterized by enlarged breasts, affecting a significant proportion of men. Persistent gynecomastia negatively affects the psychological and emotional development of patients; therefore, surgical intervention is required. In this article, we describe a surgical technique, where liposuction through an axillary incision is used in combination with a single small periareolar incision, to obtain the most minimal scars in the treatment of gynecomastia.
methodsBetween June 2021 and June 2023, 125 patients with different Simon grades of gynecomastia were enrolled. The patients' basic conditions and operation processes were recorded. Following surgery, a score was assigned according to the five main aesthetic aspects of the surgical procedure.
resultsIn total, 125 patients with gynecomastia were treated with a pre-axillary fold incision combined with a small areolar incision. There were 17 cases of Simon grade I, 46 grade IIA, 42 grade IIB, and 20 grade III. The average operation time was 45.8 min, the average liposuction volume was 250.5 mL, the average glandular tissue volume was 50.5 g, intraoperative blood loss ranged from 15 to 60 mL, and the average hospital stay was 3.2 days. Regarding the postoperative aesthetic effect, doctors scored > 4 points, and the patient satisfaction score was > 7.5, which fully affirmed the aesthetic effect of this method.
conclusionsTreatment of gynecomastia through an anterior axillary fold incision combined with a small areolar incision is safe and feasible, involving a simple procedure, short operation time, and few complications. Its efficacy and cosmetic effects could lead to its use as a primary surgical method to treat gynecomastia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39079971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.