ArticleRespiratory care2024
Feasibility of Delivering 5-Day Normobaric Hypoxia Breathing in a Hospital Setting.
Article in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Control of Mammalian Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Hypoxia ameliorates neurodegeneration and movement disorder in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- HypoxyStat, a small-molecule form of hypoxia therapy that increases oxygen-hemoglobin affinity.Cell · 2025Article
- Hypoxia as a medicine.Science translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeneficial effects of breathing at [Formula: see text] < 0.21 on disease outcomes have been reported in previous preclinical and clinical studies. However, the safety and intra-hospital feasibility of breathing hypoxic gas for 5 d have not been established. In this study, we examined the physiologic effects of breathing a gas mixture with [Formula: see text] as low as 0.11 in 5 healthy volunteers.
methodsAll 5 subjects completed the study, spending 5 consecutive days in a hypoxic tent, where the ambient oxygen level was lowered in a stepwise manner over 5 d, from [Formula: see text] of 0.16 on the first day to [Formula: see text] of 0.11 on the fifth day of the study. All the subjects returned to an environment at room air on the sixth day. The subjects' [Formula: see text], heart rate, and breathing frequency were continuously recorded, along with daily blood sampling, neurologic evaluations, transthoracic echocardiography, and mental status assessments.
resultsBreathing hypoxia concentration dependently caused profound physiologic changes, including decreased [Formula: see text] and increased heart rate. At [Formula: see text] of 0.14, the mean [Formula: see text] was 92%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.13, the mean [Formula: see text] was 93%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.12, the mean [Formula: see text] was 88%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.11, the mean [Formula: see text] was 85%; and, finally, at an [Formula: see text] of 0.21, the mean [Formula: see text] was 98%. These changes were accompanied by increased erythropoietin levels and reticulocyte counts in blood. All 5 subjects concluded the study with no adverse events. No subjects exhibited signs of mental status changes or pulmonary hypertension.
conclusionsResults of the current physiologic study suggests that, within a hospital setting, delivering [Formula: see text] as low as 0.11 is feasible and safe in healthy subjects, and provides the foundation for future studies in which therapeutic effects of hypoxia breathing are tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.