Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39079670›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Yuta Owashi, Hiroshi Arai, Tetsuya Adachi-Hagimori, Daisuke Kageyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phenotypic divergence is driven by mobile genetic elements in a heritable insect symbiont.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Male-dependent resistance toRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The facultative intracellular symbiontFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Genomic analysis of co-infection withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuta OwashiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0851, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0785-8694
Hiroshi AraiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0851, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-3489
Tetsuya Adachi-HagimoriLaboratory of Applied Entomology, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuenkibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4868-7772
Daisuke KageyamaInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0851, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-9825

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

HemipteraPhylogenyRickettsiaSymbiosisAnimalsCytoplasmFemaleMaleWolbachiacytoplasmic incompatibilityendosymbiontmirid bugreproductive manipulationRickettsia

Identifiers

PMID39079670
PMCPMC11288687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.