Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39079455›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2025

Diverse genetic conflicts mediated by molecular mimicry and computational approaches to detect them.

Shelbi L Russell, Gabriel Penunuri, Christopher Condon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shelbi L RussellGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States; Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States. Electronic address: shelbilrussell@gmail.com.
Gabriel PenunuriGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States; Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.
Christopher CondonGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States; Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.

Funding

Origins, Functional, and Evolutionary Consequences of Genomic VariationR35GM128932 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI Russell Corbett-Detig · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
UCSC Graduate Program in Genome SciencesT32HG012344 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI Angela Norie Brooks, Christopher Vollmers · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
Cellular mechanisms of endosymbiont transmission between host generationsR00GM135583 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RUSSELL, SHELBI LIANNE · 2022 to 2024
$747k
Cellular mechanisms of endosymbiont transmission between host generationsK99GM135583 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RUSSELL, SHELBI LIANNE · 2020 to 2021
$172k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG012344NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM135583NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM135583NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In genetic conflicts between intergenomic and selfish elements, driver and killer elements achieve biased survival, replication, or transmission over sensitive and targeted elements through a wide range of molecular mechanisms, including mimicry. Driving mechanisms manifest at all organismal levels, from the biased propagation of individual genes, as demonstrated by transposable elements, to the biased transmission of genomes, as illustrated by viruses, to the biased transmission of cell lineages, as in cancer. Targeted genomes are vulnerable to molecular mimicry through the conserved motifs they use for their own signaling and regulation. Mimicking these motifs enables an intergenomic or selfish element to control core target processes, and can occur at the sequence, structure, or functional level. Molecular mimicry was first appreciated as an important phenomenon more than twenty years ago. Modern genomics technologies, databases, and machine learning approaches offer tremendous potential to study the distribution of molecular mimicry across genetic conflicts in nature. Here, we explore the theoretical expectations for molecular mimicry between conflicting genomes, the trends in molecular mimicry mechanisms across known genetic conflicts, and outline how new examples can be gleaned from population genomic datasets. We discuss how mimics involving short sequence-based motifs or gene duplications can evolve convergently from new mutations. Whereas, processes that involve divergent domains or fully-folded structures occur among genomes by horizontal gene transfer. These trends are largely based on a small number of organisms and should be reevaluated in a general, phylogenetically independent framework. Currently, publicly available databases can be mined for genotypes driving non-Mendelian inheritance patterns, epistatic interactions, and convergent protein structures. A subset of these conflicting elements may be molecular mimics. We propose approaches for detecting genetic conflict and molecular mimicry from these datasets.

Indexed as

Molecular MimicryAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansConvergent evolutionGenetic conflictHorizontal gene transferMolecular mimicrySelfish element

Identifiers

PMID39079455
PMCPMC13165374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.