ArticleAging2024
A stemness-based signature with inspiring indications in discriminating the prognosis, immune response, and somatic mutation of endometrial cancer patients revealed by machine learning.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is a fatal gynecologic tumor. Bioinformatic tools are increasingly developed to screen out molecular targets related to EC. Our study aimed to identify stemness-related prognostic biomarkers for new therapeutic strategies in EC. In this study, we explored the prognostic value of cancer stem cells (CSCs), characterized by self-renewal and unlimited proliferation, and its correlation with immune infiltrates in EC. Transcriptome and somatic mutation profiles of EC were downloaded from TCGA database. Based on their stemness signature and DEGs, EC patients were divided into two subtypes via consensus clustering, and patients in Stemness Subtype I presented significantly better OS and DFS than Stemness Subtype II. Subtype I also displayed better clinicopathological features, and genomic variations demonstrated different somatic mutation from subtype II. Additionally, two stemness subtypes had distinct tumor immune microenvironment patterns. In the end, three machine learning algorithms were applied to construct a 7-gene stemness subtype risk model, which were further validated in an external independent EC cohort in our hospital. This novel stemness-based classification could provide a promising prognostic predictor for EC and may guide physicians in selecting potential responders for preferential use of immunotherapy. This novel stemness-dependent classification method has high value in predicting the prognosis, and also provides a reference for clinicians in selecting sensitive immunotherapy methods for EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.