Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39079075›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.

Ramya Thota, Patricia A Hurley, Therica M Miller, Suanna S Bruinooge, Craig Lipset, R Donald Harvey, Lora J Black, Amanda Dinsdale, Janette K Merrill, Teri Pollastro and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ramya ThotaIntermountain Health, Murray, UT.ORCID 0000-0001-6538-9924
Patricia A HurleyAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA.ORCID 0000-0001-6898-7831
Therica M MillerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-3076
Suanna S BruinoogeAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-2719
Craig LipsetDecentralized Trials and Research Alliance, San Diego, CA.
R Donald HarveyWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-1313
Lora J BlackSanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD.ORCID 0000-0002-0173-9590
Amanda DinsdaleMontana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT.ORCID 0009-0002-8966-0437
Janette K MerrillAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA.ORCID 0000-0002-6304-1833
Teri PollastroMetastatic Breast Cancer Alliance, New York, NY.
Sheila A PrindivilleNCI Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Bethesda, MD.
Mujahid A RizviHeimann Cancer Center, Asante Health System, Medford, OR.
Shimere SherwoodAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria VA.
Grzegorz S NowakowskiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-6955-9393

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to bring clinical trials closer to patients gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling more participants to receive treatment and/or testing in their local communities. Incorporation of decentralized trial elements presents both opportunities and challenges, spanning regulatory, technical, and operational aspects. This ASCO research statement includes timely consensus-driven recommendations and a call for engagement of all research stakeholders. ASCO held multistakeholder meetings with leaders in oncology research and concluded that research-related regulatory and administrative requirements and burdens present critical barriers to decentralizing trials. One example is sponsor and contract research organization (CRO) use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Statement of Investigator (Form 1572), which was found to exceed FDA's stated intent and used in conservative ways disproportionate to potential risks to participants and scientific integrity. As a result, research sites experience an avalanche of downstream administrative and regulatory activities that consume considerable resources. This statement recommends four key solutions to address such barriers and recalibrate regulatory and administrative expectations for decentralizing trials: (1) FDA should engage the research community in a public-private partnership to modernize standards and enable local access to trials; (2) sponsors and CROs should develop standards and protocols that accommodate flexible approaches, enable local participation, provide clarity around roles and requirements, and promote consistency; (3) research centers, networks, and sites should update policies and procedures to implement decentralized trial elements; and (4) research community should develop a streamlined, uniform mechanism to simplify regulatory data collection and documentation and use it consistently across trials. We can and must prioritize a concerted commitment to simplify and streamline regulatory requirements and practices to broaden access to and participation in cancer clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Health Services AccessibilityHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareSARS-CoV-2United StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID39079075
PMCPMC11568957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.