Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078880›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

MotorNet, a Python toolbox for controlling differentiable biomechanical effectors with artificial neural networks.

Olivier Codol, Jonathan A Michaels, Mehrdad Kashefi, J Andrew Pruszynski, Paul L Gribble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. InputDSA : Demixing then comparing recurrent and externally driven dynamics.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivier CodolWestern Institute for Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-5457
Jonathan A MichaelsWestern Institute for Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-3181
Mehrdad KashefiWestern Institute for Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-5923
J Andrew PruszynskiWestern Institute for Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-0081
Paul L GribbleWestern Institute for Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-032X

Funding

CIHR PJT-156241CIHR PJT-175010Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/05458-2018Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022-04421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are a powerful class of computational models for unravelling neural mechanisms of brain function. However, for neural control of movement, they currently must be integrated with software simulating biomechanical effectors, leading to limiting impracticalities: (1) researchers must rely on two different platforms and (2) biomechanical effectors are not generally differentiable, constraining researchers to reinforcement learning algorithms despite the existence and potential biological relevance of faster training methods. To address these limitations, we developed MotorNet, an open-source Python toolbox for creating arbitrarily complex, differentiable, and biomechanically realistic effectors that can be trained on user-defined motor tasks using ANNs. MotorNet is designed to meet several goals: ease of installation, ease of use, a high-level user-friendly application programming interface, and a modular architecture to allow for flexibility in model building. MotorNet requires no dependencies outside Python, making it easy to get started with. For instance, it allows training ANNs on typically used motor control models such as a two joint, six muscle, planar arm within minutes on a typical desktop computer. MotorNet is built on PyTorch and therefore can implement any network architecture that is possible using the PyTorch framework. Consequently, it will immediately benefit from advances in artificial intelligence through PyTorch updates. Finally, it is open source, enabling users to create and share their own improvements, such as new effector and network architectures or custom task designs. MotorNet's focus on higher-order model and task design will alleviate overhead cost to initiate computational projects for new researchers by providing a standalone, ready-to-go framework, and speed up efforts of established computational teams by enabling a focus on concepts and ideas over implementation.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansbiomechanical modelcomputational modelmotor controlmotor learningmuscle modelneural networkneurosciencenone

Identifiers

PMID39078880
PMCPMC11288629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.