ArticleMilitary medicine2025
Spices and Herbs Increase Vegetable Palatability Among Military Service Members.
Article in Military medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Spices and Herbs in Improving Diet Quality Among Underserved Populations.Nutrition reviews · 2026Article
- Meeting Service Members Where They Are: Supporting Vegetable Consumption Through Convenient Meal Kits.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Pandemic Recipes-Nutritional Values of Recipes in Legacy Media.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUnhealthy eating behaviors are adversely impacting the health and performance of the U.S. armed forces. Vegetable intake, in particular, has been shown to be far below recommended levels in active duty military populations. Previous research in other populations has shown that the addition of spices and herbs can help overcome numerous barriers to vegetable intake. The goal of this study was to determine modifiable barriers to vegetable intake among a sample of active duty military service members at Naval Support Activity Bethesda and evaluate whether the addition of spices and herbs can help surmount these barriers. MATERIALS AND
methodsMonadic sensory testing was conducted that compared typical preparation (butter and salt) of 4 vegetables (broccoli, carrots, cauliflower, and kale) vs. otherwise identical preparation with the addition of spices and herbs. The Menu Item Survey, a 9-point hedonic scale utilized throughout the U.S. Military for recipe development, was the primary outcome of the vegetable sensory testing. Questionnaires were administered to assess barriers to military dining facility vegetable intake. Unpaired t-tests were utilized to compare Menu Item Survey ratings of typical vegetables vs. vegetables with spices and herbs. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize the results of the barriers questionnaires, and qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted to identify perceived areas of improved vegetable intake.
resultsA diverse sample of 70 active duty service members participated in the vegetable sensory testing and provided outcome data. The most common barriers to military dining facility vegetable intake were appearance (42.9%), preparation style (41.3%), and taste (39.7%). Sensory testing revealed that vegetables with spices and herbs were preferred over typical preparations in overall appeal, flavor, and aroma (P <.03). DISCUSSION: The addition of spices and herbs appears to help overcome key sensory-related barriers to military dining facility vegetable intake. Future comparison of vegetable intake with and without spices and herbs when included in a full meal in a military dining setting is warranted in order to better evaluate the effectiveness in increasing vegetable intake under typical dining conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.