Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078699›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Acceptability, Engagement, and Feasibility of Mental Health Apps for Marginalized and Underserved Young People: Systematic Review and Qualitative Study.

Holly Alice Bear, Lara Ayala Nunes, Giovanni Ramos, Tanya Manchanda, Blossom Fernandes, Sophia Chabursky, Sabine Walper, Edward Watkins, Mina Fazel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Framing Helper Therapy to Support User Engagement: Causal Evidence from a Public Deployment of a Mental Health Support Text Messaging Program.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Holly Alice BearDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6737-6120
Lara Ayala NunesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-7731
Giovanni RamosDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5445-5180
Tanya ManchandaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-345X
Blossom FernandesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2443-4391
Sophia ChaburskyGerman Youth Institute, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-5489
Sabine WalperGerman Youth Institute, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6212-5242
Edward WatkinsSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2432-5577
Mina FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-2365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphone apps may provide an opportunity to deliver mental health resources and interventions in a scalable and cost-effective manner. However, young people from marginalized and underserved groups face numerous and unique challenges to accessing, engaging with, and benefiting from these apps.

objectiveThis study aims to better understand the acceptability (ie, perceived usefulness and satisfaction with an app) and feasibility (ie, the extent to which an app was successfully used) of mental health apps for underserved young people. A secondary aim was to establish whether adaptations can be made to increase the accessibility and inclusivity of apps for these groups.

methodsWe conducted 2 sequential studies, consisting of a systematic literature review of mental health apps for underserved populations followed by a qualitative study with underserved young male participants (n=20; age: mean 19). Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, an electronic search of 5 databases was conducted in 2021. The search yielded 18,687 results, of which 14 articles met the eligibility criteria.

resultsThe included studies comprised a range of groups, including those affected by homelessness, having physical health conditions, living in low- and middle-income countries, and those with sexual and gender minority identities. Establishing and maintaining user engagement was a pervasive challenge across mental health apps and populations, and dropout was a reported problem among nearly all the included studies. Positive subjective reports of usability, satisfaction, and acceptability were insufficient to determine users' objective engagement.

conclusionsDespite the significant amount of funding directed to the development of mental health apps, juxtaposed with only limited empirical evidence to support their effectiveness, few apps have been deliberately developed or adapted to meet the heterogeneous needs of marginalized and underserved young people. Before mental health apps are scaled up, a greater understanding is needed of the types of services that more at-risk young people and those in limited-resource settings prefer (eg, standard vs digital) followed by more rigorous and consistent demonstrations of acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Adopting an iterative participatory approach by involving young people in the development and evaluation process is an essential step in enhancing the adoption of any intervention, including apps, in "real-world" settings and will support future implementation and sustainability efforts to ensure that marginalized and underserved groups are reached.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42021254241; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=254241.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesMobile ApplicationsQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareSmartphoneVulnerable PopulationsYoung Adultacceptabilityadolescent mental healthchallengeseffectivenessengagementimplementation sciencemarginalized groupsmental healthmHealthmobile appmobile healthmobile phonesmartphonesmartphone appsyoung

Identifiers

PMID39078699
PMCPMC11322694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.