Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078654›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic surgery journal2024

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Surgical Outcomes of Progressive Tension Suturing Compared to Drains in Abdominoplasty Surgery.

Gautham Rao, Kian Daneshi, Alessandra Ceccaroni, Antonioenrico Gentile, Hafiz El-Shazali, Niamh Owens, Krishna Vyas, Ankur Khajuria

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kian Daneshi
Alessandra Ceccaroni
Antonioenrico Gentile
Hafiz El-Shazali
Niamh Owens
Krishna Vyas
Ankur Khajuria

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closed suction drains are placed to prevent seroma formation after abdominoplasty, but evidence of their effectiveness is limited, and they may increase infection risk and patient discomfort. Previous meta-analyses comparing progressive tension suturing (PTS) to drainage (D) in abdominoplasty have been methodologically weak and small in sample size. In this study we aimed to conduct the first robust systematic review comparing PTS and D outcomes in abdominoplasty. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022346106). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from September 19, 2022, to February 19, 2024. Data were pooled with a random effects Mantel-Haenszel model. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool and the ROBINS-I tool for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system evaluated methodological quality. PTS significantly reduced postoperative seroma rates (relative risk [RR] 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.76; P = .001) and reoperation rates (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.03-9.77; P = .05) compared to drains, with no significant differences in hematomas, infections, or dehiscence. The review included 24 studies with 750 patients, including 2 randomized controlled trials, and was found to be methodologically superior by AMSTAR 2 criteria. Subgroup analysis indicated that combining liposuction with PTS significantly reduced seromas (RR 0.18; 95%CI 0.00-7.39; P < .00001), infections (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.86; P = .03), and dehiscence (RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01-1.01; P = .05). This robust meta-analysis showed that PTS was more effective than drains in reducing seroma and reoperation rates, with no difference for hematomas or infections. Combining liposuction with PTS may be superior to placing drains. Larger, high-quality studies are needed to further assess the safety and efficacy of drainless abdominoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1:

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyDrainagePostoperative ComplicationsHumansReoperationSeromaSuture TechniquesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39078654
PMCPMC11634385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.