Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078592›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Visual free recall and recognition in art students and laypeople.

Filip Děchtěrenko, Wilma A Bainbridge, Jiří Lukavský

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filip DěchtěrenkoInstitute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, Prague, 18200, Czech Republic. dechterenko@praha.psu.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-0472-915X
Wilma A BainbridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Beecher Hall 303, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7554-0736
Jiří LukavskýInstitute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, Prague, 18200, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1082-229X

Funding

The neural and behavioral causes underlying differences between visual perception and memoryR01EY034432 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Wilma A. Bainbridge · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artists and laypeople differ in their ability to create drawings. Previous research has shown that artists have improved memory performance during drawing; however, it is unclear whether they have better visual memory after the drawing is finished. In this paper, we focused on the question of differences in visual memory between art students and the general population in two studies. In Study 1, both groups studied a set of images and later drew them in a surprise visual recall test. In Study 2, the drawings from Study 1 were evaluated by a different set of raters based on their drawing quality and similarity to the original image to link drawing evaluations with memory performance for both groups. We found that both groups showed comparable visual recognition memory performance; however, the artist group showed increased recall memory performance. Moreover, they produced drawings that were both better quality and more similar to the original image. Individually, participants whose drawings were rated as better showed higher recognition accuracy. Results from Study 2 also have practical implications for the usage of drawing as a tool for measuring free recall - the majority of the drawings were recognizable, and raters showed a high level of consistency during their evaluation of the drawings. Taken together, we found that artists have better visual recall memory than laypeople.

Indexed as

ArtMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStudentsYoung AdultArtistsDrawingsVisual memory

Identifiers

PMID39078592
PMCPMC11789472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.