Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078582›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2024

Psychometric Evaluation of the Facial and Total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index Instruments in the TRuE-V Phase 3 Studies.

Kristen Bibeau, Kathleen Butler, Mingyue Wang, Konstantina Skaltsa, Iltefat H Hamzavi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04052425 phase3completednot on this map

Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Vitiligo Study 1 (TRuE-V1): A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by an Extension Period in Participants With Vitiligo

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2019 to 2021Enrolled330ConditionsNon-segmental VitiligoArmsRuxolitinib cream, Vehicle
NCT04057573 phase3completednot on this map

Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Vitiligo Study 2 (TRuE-V2): A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by an Extension Period in Participants With Vitiligo

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2019 to 2021Enrolled344ConditionsNon-segmental VitiligoArmsRuxolitinib cream, Vehicle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristen BibeauIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-2333
Kathleen ButlerIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6907-0846
Mingyue WangIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Konstantina SkaltsaIQVIA Consulting Services, Barcelona, Spain.
Iltefat H HamzaviDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Medical Center, 3031 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. IHamzavi@hamzavi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3137-5601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study reports psychometric testing of the facial and total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index quantitative clinical instruments (F-VASI [range: 0-3], T-VASI [range: 0-100], respectively) using data from two phase 3 randomized, vehicle-controlled studies of ruxolitinib cream (TRuE-V1/TRuE-V2), the largest vitiligo trials conducted to date. Because VASI assessment is required by regulatory authorities, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the VASI instruments and confirmed thresholds for clinically meaningful change.

methodsThe TRuE-V1/TRuE-V2 full analysis set population included 652 patients (≥ 12 years old with nonsegmental vitiligo affecting ≤ 10% total body surface area, F-VASI ≥ 0.5, and T-VASI ≥ 3 at baseline). Data collected using the facial and total Patient Global Impression of Change-Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) and Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (PhGVA) scales were used as anchors to assess F-VASI and T-VASI for reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and clinically meaningful change.

resultsMedian F-VASI and T-VASI scores were 0.70 and 6.76, respectively, at baseline, decreasing to 0.48 and 4.80 at week 24. Test-retest reliability was excellent between screening and baseline for F-VASI (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.943) and T-VASI (ICC: 0.945). Among stable patients per PaGIC-V and PhGVA, reliability was moderate to good for both F-VASI (ICC: 0.891 and 0.739, respectively) and T-VASI (ICC: 0.768 and 0.686). F-VASI and T-VASI differentiated well among PhGVA categories mild/moderate/severe at baseline and week 24. Both VASI instruments detected changes assessed by correlations with PaGIC-V scores at week 24 (F-VASI, r = 0.610; T-VASI, r = 0.512) and changes in PhGVA scores from baseline to week 24 (F-VASI, r = 0.501; T-VASI, r = 0.344). Thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement per PaGIC-V and PhGVA were 0.38-0.60 for F-VASI and 1.69-3.88 for T-VASI.

conclusionsData from the TRuE-V1/TRuE-V2 studies confirmed that F-VASI and T-VASI are reliable, valid, and responsive to change, with defined clinically meaningful change from baseline in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo.

trial registrationThe original studies were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04052425/NCT04057573.

Indexed as

RepigmentationRuxolitinib creamVASIVitiligo

Identifiers

PMID39078582
PMCPMC11333635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.