ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024
Assessment of contamination, mobility and application of selected technology-critical elements as indicators of anthropogenic pollution of bottom sediments.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technology-Critical Element Exposure Reveals Divergent Toxicity in Different Human Cells Despite Comparable Uptake.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Impact of photovoltaics on soil and water by metal(loid)s including technology critical elements: preliminary study.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study investigates the potential of technology-critical elements (TCEs) in the bottom sediments of the Biała Przemsza River as indicators of anthropogenic activities. The mass fractions of TCEs: Ge, Ga, In, Tl, Sb and Te (and other elements) in the sediment were analysed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with the maximum mass fractions: 2.46, 25.6, 0.528, 27.7, 12.5 and 0.293 mg/kg, respectively. Distribution and identification of TCE sources were supported by statistical analysis (principal component analysis coupled with varimax rotation and hierarchical cluster analysis). Assessments of TCE contamination using the geoaccumulation index, pollution index, contamination factor, enrichment factor and the antimony-to-arsenic ratio highlighted the high contamination of bottom sediments by Sb, Ga, Tl, Cd, As, Zn, Pb and moderate contamination by Co, In and V. Distinct behaviour patterns were observed among TCEs, revealing Sb and Tl as potential indicators of Zn-Pb ore mining activities. Co, V, Ge and, to a lesser extent, Te emerged as promising indicators of coal and coal fly ash effluents. Sequential chemical extraction of TCEs showed that Sb, In and Tl had the highest mobility from sediments. The Risk Assessment Code calculations suggest, that in the Biała Przemsza River bottom sediments, there is an average risk of contamination by As, Tl and Mn. Soluble forms of Tl, Ge, Sb, Te and In were identified in descending order, indicating their bioavailability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.