SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024
Direct oral anticoagulants in embolic stroke of undetermined source: an updated meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Serum biomarkers insights into occult atrial fibrillation related to embolic strokes of undetermined source: a narrative review.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Temporal patterns, incidence, and predictors of early stroke recurrence in atrial fibrillation.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Temporal patterns, incidence, and predictors of early stroke recurrence in atrial fibrillation.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- In reply: letter to the editor about "Direct oral anticoagulants in embolic stroke of undetermined source: an updated meta-analysis".Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Stroke Prevention After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) remains unclear. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs versus aspirin in patients with ESUS. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed for binary endpoints. Four RCTs comprising 13,970 patients were included. Compared with aspirin, DOACs showed no significant reduction of recurrent stroke (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84-1.09; p = 0.50; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
39078535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.