Trial reportHeart and vessels2025
Sex-based differences in left ventricular mass reduction across angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction.
Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of comparatively young heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PurSuit-HFpEF registry.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are more effective in women for either reduction of blood pressure or heart failure (HF), the gender disparities and the impact of class/drug effects on ARBs in relation to cardiac hypertrophy and HF remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the sex-based and drug-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) mass reduction with ARBs. We employed the cohort of 193 hypertensive patients with HF and an LV ejection fraction of ≥ 45% treated with azilsartan or candesartan once daily for 48 weeks as a sub-analysis of the J-TASTE trial. After exclusion of patients without LV mass data nor the drugs, 170 patients were finally enrolled (azilsartan: male, n = 43, female, n = 39 and candesartan: male, n = 52; female, n = 36). We investigated the sex-based differences of the primary endpoint of the change in LV mass as assessed by echocardiography from baseline to the end of the study (48 weeks), and the secondary endpoint of the incidence of the composite cardiovascular endpoint (death from cardiovascular disease or hospitalization for heart failure). In the male stratum, the ratio of patients with > 10% LV mass reduction at 48 weeks was higher in the azilsartan group than candesartan group (40 vs. 19%, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in LV mass reduction between two groups in the female stratum. There were no differences of the onset of the secondary endpoints between male and female groups, and azilsartan and candesartan groups. The event-free survival rate of the composite cardiovascular endpoints tended to be lower in patients with ≤ 10% than > 10% LV mass reduction (95.3 vs. 100% at 48 weeks, log-rank p = 0.11). In patients with HF, the effectiveness of either azilsartan or candesartan in achieving > 10% LV mass reduction depends on sex. Male is more sensitive to azilsartan than candesartan to achieve cardiac hypertrophy in HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39078503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.