GuidelineJapanese journal of ophthalmology2024
Specification of variant interpretation guidelines for inherited retinal dystrophy in Japan.
Guideline in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in early childhood health management: a systematic review from fetal to pediatric periods.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Epidemiology of macular dystrophy in Japan (2011-2020): a nationwide population-based study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical and genetic characterization of REEP6-associated retinopathy in a Japanese cohort.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Initial Site of Macular Involvement in Central Retinal Dystrophies Revealed by Fundus Autofluorescence and Optical Coherence Tomography.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Phenotypic features of EYS-associated retinitis pigmentosa with the c.2528 G > A (p.Gly843Glu) mutation in a Japanese cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From enrichment to interpretation: PS4-driven reclassification in Taiwanese inherited retinal degeneration.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Proposal for a Germline Expert Panel to Improve Variant Reclassification in Japan.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Phenotypic variability of RP1-related inherited retinal dystrophy associated with the c.5797 C > T (p.Arg1933*) variant in the Japanese population.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate interpretation of sequence variants in inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) is vital given the significant genetic heterogeneity observed in this disorder. To achieve consistent and accurate diagnoses, establishment of standardized guidelines for variant interpretation is essential. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for variant interpretation serve as the global "cross-disease" standard for classifying variants in Mendelian hereditary disorders. These guidelines propose a systematic approach for categorizing variants into 5 classes based on various types of evidence, such as population data, computational data, functional data, and segregation data. However, for clinical genetic diagnosis and to ensure standardized diagnosis and treatment criteria, additional specifications based on features associated with each disorder are necessary. In this context, we present a comprehensive framework outlining the newly specified ACMG/AMP rules tailored explicitly to IRD in the Japanese population on behalf of the Research Group on Rare and Intractable Diseases (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan). These guidelines consider disease frequencies, allele frequencies, and both the phenotypic and the genotypic characteristics unique to IRD in the Japanese population. Adjustments and modifications have been incorporated to reflect the specific requirements of the population. By incorporating these IRD-specific factors and refining the existing ACMG/AMP guidelines, we aim to enhance the accuracy and consistency of variant interpretation in IRD cases, particularly in the Japanese population. These guidelines serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists and clinical geneticists involved in the diagnosis and treatment of IRD, providing them with a standardized framework to assess and classify genetic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39078460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.