ArticleObesity surgery2024
Assessment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Safety in Patients with Advanced Liver Fibrosis.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Derivation and internal validation of the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF)-based prediction score for advanced liver fibrosis in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparative impact of different weight loss strategies on obstructive sleep apnea: an integrated review of surgical, pharmacological, and lifestyle interventions.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe well-established relationship between obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a key etiological factor in the development of liver cirrhosis. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for weight loss in patients with moderate-to-severe obesity, also playing a role in controlling MASLD. However, surgical safety in patients with advanced fibrosis remains to be established. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and repercussions of bariatric surgery according to fibrosis stage. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients undergoing bariatric surgery who had an intraoperative liver biopsy were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected from medical records, and results were stratified according to fibrosis stage into early fibrosis (no fibrosis or stages 1 and 2) and advanced fibrosis (stages 3 and 4).
resultsThe study included 1185 patients: 1129 with early fibrosis and 56 with advanced fibrosis. The advanced fibrosis group had higher percentage of men (35.7% vs 21.6%, p = 0.014) and of people with diabetes (42.9% vs 16.5%, p < 0.001) and hypertension (57.1% vs 41.4%, p = 0.012). Patients with advanced fibrosis also required longer hospitalizations (4.64 vs 4.06 days, p < 0.001) and were more frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (7.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.038). The groups did not differ significantly in other outcomes. There were no deaths in either group.
conclusionBariatric surgery proved to be safe, with similar complication rates in patients with advanced fibrosis and in those with early fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39078451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.