Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078397›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Divergent folding-mediated epistasis among unstable membrane protein variants.

Laura M Chamness, Charles P Kuntz, Andrew G McKee, Wesley D Penn, Christopher M Hemmerich, Douglas B Rusch, Hope Woods, Dyotima, Jens Meiler, Jonathan P Schlebach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura M ChamnessDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-2799
Charles P KuntzThe James Tarpo Jr. and Margaret Tarpo Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States.
Andrew G McKeeDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-987X
Wesley D PennDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Christopher M HemmerichCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Douglas B RuschCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Hope WoodsDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-545X
DyotimaDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States.
Jonathan P SchlebachThe James Tarpo Jr. and Margaret Tarpo Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-7633

Funding

Topological Energetics and the Cellular Quality Control of Integral Membrane ProteinsR01GM129261 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLEBACH, JONATHAN PATRICK · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
National Science Foundation 1342962NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129261NIH HHS R01GM129261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many membrane proteins are prone to misfolding, which compromises their functional expression at the plasma membrane. This is particularly true for the mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor GPCRs (GnRHR). We recently demonstrated that evolutionary GnRHR modifications appear to have coincided with adaptive changes in cotranslational folding efficiency. Though protein stability is known to shape evolution, it is unclear how cotranslational folding constraints modulate the synergistic, epistatic interactions between mutations. We therefore compared the pairwise interactions formed by mutations that disrupt the membrane topology (V276T) or tertiary structure (W107A) of GnRHR. Using deep mutational scanning, we evaluated how the plasma membrane expression of these variants is modified by hundreds of secondary mutations. An analysis of 251 mutants in three genetic backgrounds reveals that V276T and W107A form distinct epistatic interactions that depend on both the severity and the mechanism of destabilization. V276T forms predominantly negative epistatic interactions with destabilizing mutations in soluble loops. In contrast, W107A forms positive interactions with mutations in both loops and transmembrane domains that reflect the diminishing impacts of the destabilizing mutations in variants that are already unstable. These findings reveal how epistasis is remodeled by conformational defects in membrane proteins and in unstable proteins more generally.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticMembrane ProteinsProtein FoldingReceptors, LHRHCell MembraneHumansMutationProtein StabilityGNRHR protein, humanMembrane ProteinsReceptors, LHRHepistasishumanmembrane protein foldingmolecular biophysicsprotein evolutionprotein misfoldingstructural biologytranslocon

Identifiers

PMID39078397
PMCPMC11288631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.