Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024
Pharmacogenomic Score Effectively Personalizes Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Collaborative Trial for the Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplasia
AML08: A Phase II Randomized Trial of Clofarabine Plus Cytarabine Versus Conventional Induction Therapy And A Phase II Study Of Natural Killer Cell Transplantation In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytarabine Pharmacogenomics and Outcomes Among Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Interactive Use of Cox Model-Predicted Survival Curves: An Application Using ACS10 Score and Age to Personalize Treatment of Pediatric AML.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Advances and Challenges in Targeted Therapy and Its Combination Strategies for Leukemia.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCytarabine (also known as ara-C) has been the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy for more than five decades. Recent pharmacogenomics-based 10-SNP ara-C (ACS10) scores showed low ACS10 (≤0) to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with AML treated with standard chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated the ACS10 score in the context of three different induction I regimens in patients with pediatric AML. EXPERIMENTAL
designACS10 score groups (low, ≤0, or high, >0) were evaluated for association with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) by three randomized treatment arms in patients treated on the AML02 (NCT00136084) and AML08 (NCT00703820) clinical trials: AML02 low-dose ara-C (LDAC arm, n = 91), AML02 + AML08 high-dose ara-C (HDAC arm, n = 194), and AML08 clofarabine + ara-C (Clo/ara-C arm, n = 105) induction I regimens.
resultsWithin the low-ACS10 score (≤0) group, significantly improved EFS and OS were observed among patients treated with Clo/ara-C as compared with LDAC (EFS, HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P = 0.020; OS, HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.19-0.99; P = 0.048). In contrast, within the high-ACS10 score group (score >0), augmentation with Clo/ara-C was not favorable as compared with LDAC (Clo/ara-C vs. LDAC, EFS, HR = 1.95; 95% CI, 1.05-3.63; P = 0.035; OS, HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 0.96-4.59; P = 0.063). Personalization models predicted 9% improvement in the outcome in ACS10 score-based tailored induction (Clo/ara-C for low and LDAC for high-ACS10 score groups) as compared with nonpersonalized approaches (P < 0.002).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that tailoring induction regimens using ACS10 scores can significantly improve outcomes in patients with AML. Given the SNPs are germline, preemptive genotyping can accelerate matching the most effective remission induction regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.