Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078287›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

A scoping review of rule-based clinical decision support malfunctions.

Jeritt G Thayer, Amy Franklin, Jeffrey M Miller, Robert W Grundmeier, Deevakar Rogith, Adam Wright

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeritt G ThayerDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, United States.
Amy FranklinMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Jeffrey M MillerDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, United States.
Robert W GrundmeierDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, United States.
Deevakar RogithMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2351-1538
Adam WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6844-145X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConduct a scoping review of research studies that describe rule-based clinical decision support (CDS) malfunctions. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn April 2022, we searched three bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase) for literature referencing CDS malfunctions. We coded the identified malfunctions according to an existing CDS malfunction taxonomy and added new categories for factors not already captured. We also extracted and summarized information related to the CDS system, such as architecture, data source, and data format.

resultsTwenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria, capturing 130 malfunctions. Architectures used included stand-alone systems (eg, web-based calculator), integrated systems (eg, best practices alerts), and service-oriented architectures (eg, distributed systems like SMART or CDS Hooks). No standards-based CDS malfunctions were identified. The "Cause" category of the original taxonomy includes three new types (organizational policy, hardware error, and data source) and two existing causes were expanded to include additional layers. Only 29 malfunctions (22%) described the potential impact of the malfunction on patient care. DISCUSSION: While a substantial amount of research on CDS exists, our review indicates there is a limited focus on CDS malfunctions, with even less attention on malfunctions associated with modern delivery architectures such as SMART and CDS Hooks.

conclusionCDS malfunctions can and do occur across several different care delivery architectures. To account for advances in health information technology, existing taxonomies of CDS malfunctions must be continually updated. This will be especially important for service-oriented architectures, which connect several disparate systems, and are increasing in use.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalClinical Decision RulesHumansclinicaldecision support systemsequipment failure analysishealth information interoperability/standardshealth information technologysoftware

Identifiers

PMID39078287
PMCPMC11413449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.