Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39078282›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2024

Microbial Primer: what is the stringent response and how does it allow bacteria to survive stress?

Lucy Urwin, Orestis Savva, Rebecca M Corrigan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Suppressor analysis inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy UrwinThe Florey Institute of Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Orestis SavvaThe Florey Institute of Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Rebecca M CorriganThe Florey Institute of Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stringent response is a conserved bacterial stress response that allows bacteria to alter their activity and survive under nutrient-limiting conditions. Activation of the stringent response is characterized by the production of intracellular signalling molecules, collectively termed (p)ppGpp, which interact with multiple targets inside bacterial cells. Together, these interactions induce a slow growth phenotype to aid bacterial survival by altering the transcriptomic profile of the cell, inhibiting ribosome biosynthesis and targeting enzymes involved in other key metabolic processes.

Indexed as

BacteriaGene Expression Regulation, BacterialStress, PhysiologicalBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacterial ProteinsGuanosine PentaphosphateMicrobial ViabilitySignal TransductionBacterial ProteinsGuanosine PentaphosphateppGppstressstringent response

Identifiers

PMID39078282
PMCPMC11288640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.