ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Genome-wide detection of somatic mosaicism at short tandem repeats.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The contribution of short tandem repeats to splicing variation in the human cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unravelling genome-wide mosaic microsatellite mutations at single-cell resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Read-level genotyping of short tandem repeats using long reads and single-nucleotide variation with STRkit.Genome research · 2026Article
- Scalable and comprehensive mosaic variant calling using DRAGEN.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- The Impact of Variant Calling on Substitution Mutational Signature Inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide selection inference at short tandem repeats.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- ONT in Clinical Diagnostics of Repeat Expansion Disorders: Detection and Reporting Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Nanopore sequencing with unique molecular identifiers enables accurate mutation analysis and haplotyping in the complex lipoprotein(a) KIV-2 VNTR.Genome medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSomatic mosaicism has been implicated in several developmental disorders, cancers, and other diseases. Short tandem repeats (STRs) consist of repeated sequences of 1-6 bp and comprise >1 million loci in the human genome. Somatic mosaicism at STRs is known to play a key role in the pathogenicity of loci implicated in repeat expansion disorders and is highly prevalent in cancers exhibiting microsatellite instability. While a variety of tools have been developed to genotype germline variation at STRs, a method for systematically identifying mosaic STRs is lacking.
resultsWe introduce prancSTR, a novel method for detecting mosaic STRs from individual high-throughput sequencing datasets. prancSTR is designed to detect loci characterized by a single high-frequency mosaic allele, but can also detect loci with multiple mosaic alleles. Unlike many existing mosaicism detection methods for other variant types, prancSTR does not require a matched control sample as input. We show that prancSTR accurately identifies mosaic STRs in simulated data, demonstrate its feasibility by identifying candidate mosaic STRs in Illumina whole genome sequencing data derived from lymphoblastoid cell lines for individuals sequenced by the 1000 Genomes Project, and evaluate the use of prancSTR on Element and PacBio data. In addition to prancSTR, we present simTR, a novel simulation framework which simulates raw sequencing reads with realistic error profiles at STRs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: prancSTR and simTR are freely available at https://github.com/gymrek-lab/trtools. Detailed documentation is available at https://trtools.readthedocs.io/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.