ArticleMedical physics2024
A medical image classification method based on self-regularized adversarial learning.
Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning (DL) techniques have been extensively applied in medical image classification. The unique characteristics of medical imaging data present challenges, including small labeled datasets, severely imbalanced class distribution, and significant variations in imaging quality. Recently, generative adversarial network (GAN)-based classification methods have gained attention for their ability to enhance classification accuracy by incorporating realistic GAN-generated images as data augmentation. However, the performance of these GAN-based methods often relies on high-quality generated images, while large amounts of training data are required to train GAN models to achieve optimal performance. PURPOSE: In this study, we propose an adversarial learning-based classification framework to achieve better classification performance. Innovatively, GAN models are employed as supplementary regularization terms to support classification, aiming to address the challenges described above.
methodsThe proposed classification framework, GAN-DL, consists of a feature extraction network (F-Net), a classifier, and two adversarial networks, specifically a reconstruction network (R-Net) and a discriminator network (D-Net). The F-Net extracts features from input images, and the classifier uses these features for classification tasks. R-Net and D-Net have been designed following the GAN architecture. R-Net employs the extracted feature to reconstruct the original images, while D-Net is tasked with the discrimination between the reconstructed image and the original images. An iterative adversarial learning strategy is designed to guide model training by incorporating multiple network-specific loss functions. These loss functions, serving as supplementary regularization, are automatically derived during the reconstruction process and require no additional data annotation.
resultsTo verify the model's effectiveness, we performed experiments on two datasets, including a COVID-19 dataset with 13 958 chest x-ray images and an oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) dataset with 3255 positron emission tomography images. Thirteen classic DL-based classification methods were implemented on the same datasets for comparison. Performance metrics included precision, sensitivity, specificity, and
conclusionOur adversarial-based classification framework leverages GAN-based adversarial networks and an iterative adversarial learning strategy to harness supplementary regularization during training. This design significantly enhances classification accuracy and mitigates overfitting issues in medical image datasets. Moreover, its modular design not only demonstrates flexibility but also indicates its potential applicability to various clinical contexts and medical imaging applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.