Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077969›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2024

Pain is a cardinal symptom cutting across Rome IV anatomical categories in disorders of gut-brain interaction: A network-based approach.

Helen Burton-Murray, Livia Guadagnoli, Irina A Vanzhula, Tiffany A Brown, Ami D Sperber, Olafur Palsson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Kyle Staller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Helen Burton-MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-3256
Livia GuadagnoliLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2925-3955
Irina A VanzhulaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Tiffany A BrownDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Ami D SperberFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7634-3689
Olafur PalssonCenter for Functional GI & Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Shrikant I BangdiwalaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-0689
Lukas Van OudenhoveLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kyle StallerDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4925-4290

Funding

A Biobehavioral Approach to Understand Problematic Avoidant/Restrictive Eating in Adults with Functional DyspepsiaK23DK131334 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BURTON MURRAY, HELEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
The Role of Fiber in the Etiopathogenesis of Fecal IncontinenceK23DK120945 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STALLER, KYLE · 2020 to 2024
$1.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK120945NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK131334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are symptom-based disorders categorized by anatomic location but have high overlap and heterogeneity. Viewing DGBI symptoms on a spectrum (i.e. dimensionally) rather than categorically may better inform interventions to accommodate complex clinical presentations. We aimed to evaluate symptom networks to identify how DGBI symptoms interact.

methodsWe used the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire continuously/ordinally scored items collected from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study. We excluded participants who reported ≥1 organic/structural gastrointestinal disorder(s). We sought to (1) identify core symptoms in the DGBI symptom networks, (2) identify bridge pathways between Rome IV diagnostic categories (esophageal, bowel, gastroduodenal, anorectal), and (3) explore how symptoms group together into communities.

resultsOf 54,127 adults, 20,229 met criteria for at least one DGBI (age mean = 42.2 ± 15.5; 57% female). General abdominal pain and epigastric pain were the core symptoms in the DGBI symptom network (i.e., had the strongest connections to other symptoms). Pain symptoms emerged as bridge pathways across existing DGBI diagnostic anatomic location (i.e., abdominal pain connected to chest pain, epigastric pain, rectal pain). Without a priori category definitions, exploratory network community analysis showed that symptoms grouped together into "pain," "gastroduodenal," and "constipation," rather than into groups by anatomic location.

conclusionOur findings suggest pain symptoms are central and serve as a key connection to other symptoms, crosscutting anatomic location. Future longitudinal research is needed to test symptom network relations longitudinally and investigate whether targeting pain symptoms (rather than anatomic- or disorder-specific symptoms) has clinical impact.

Indexed as

Brain-Gut AxisGastrointestinal DiseasesAbdominal PainAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesabdominal paincommunity analysisdisorders of gut‐brain interactionfunctional gastrointestinal disordersirritable bowel syndromenetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID39077969
PMCPMC12212471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.