Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077797›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Patterns of Infliximab Biosimilar Uptake for Medicare, Medicaid, and Private Insurance from 2016 to 2022.

Eric T Roberts, Jing Li, Nick Bansback, Chien-Wen Tseng, Steve Shiboski, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric T RobertsUniversity of California, San Francisco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8435-8994
Jing LiUniversity of California, San Francisco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-2112
Nick BansbackUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chien-Wen TsengUniversity of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu.
Steve ShiboskiUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Gabriela SchmajukUniversity of California, San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-5043
Jinoos YazdanyUniversity of California, San Francisco and Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3508-4094

Funding

Skeletal Biology and Biomechanics (SBB) CoreP30AR075055 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Wenhan Chang · 2019 to 2026
$7.1M
Advancing Safety Process Innovation in Rheumatology (ASPIRE)R01HS028024 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YAZDANY, JINOOS · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
Advancing Quality and Outcomes Measurement in RheumatologyK24AR074534 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jinoos Yazdany · 2019 to 2026
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS028024American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registryNIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR074534NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR075055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBiosimilars have the potential to reduce spending on biologic drugs, yet uptake has been slower than anticipated. We investigated how successive introductions of infliximab biosimilars influenced their adoption by major US insurance providers.

methodsData came from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from more than 1,100 US rheumatologists. All infliximab administrations (bio-originator or biosimilar) to patients aged ≥18 years from April 2016 to September 2022 were included. We used an interrupted time series to model the effect of each infliximab biosimilar release (infliximab-dyyb, November 2016; infliximab-adba, July 2017; and infliximab-axxq, July 2020) on uptake across Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers.

resultsWith the first and second biosimilar releases, biosimilar uptake rose slowly, with average annual increases of ≤5% from 2016 to June 2020 (Medicare 3.2%, Medicaid 5.2%, and private insurance 1.8%). With the third biosimilar release in July 2020, the average annual increase reached 13% for Medicaid and 16.4% for private insurance but remained low for Medicare (5.6%). By September 2022, uptake was higher for Medicaid (43.8%) and private insurance (38.5%) than for Medicare (24%).

conclusionOur results have two key findings for policy makers. First, our results suggest that one or two biosimilars may not generate enough competition to speed adoption rates for biosimilars. Second, Medicare, which covers most patients receiving biologics nationally, had slow adoption rates even after the third biosimilar was introduced. Policy levers to speed adoption among Medicare beneficiaries are needed.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsInfliximabMedicaidMedicareAntirheumatic AgentsHumansInsurance, HealthUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID39077797
PMCPMC11606780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.