ReviewFrontiers in neuroimaging2024
The importance of brain mapping for rehabilitation in birth nonprogressive neuromuscular diseases.
Review in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of intellectual development in children diagnosed with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While motor mapping has been extensively studied in acquired motor conditions, a lack has been observed in terms of research on neurological disorders present since birth, with damage to the spinal cord and peripheral nerves (hence, defined in this study as nonprogressive neuromuscular diseases). Despite an injury at the level below the brain, the subsequent changes in the motor system involve cortical reorganization. In the scientific community, the need for a comprehensive approach targeting the brain is increasingly recognized for greater motor recovery in these patients. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are the most utilized techniques for motor mapping. The knowledge obtained through motor mapping may be used to develop effective individual neuromodulation therapy that helps in functional motor recovery. This brief review compares the results of the brain mapping of a few existing studies in individuals with nonprogressive motor disorders of nonbrain origin present at birth to the brain mapping of individuals with similar acquired motor conditions. The review reveals some particular features in terms of central adaptation in individuals with birth conditions compared to their acquired counterparts, such as the nonsomatotopic presentation of involved muscles in the sensorimotor cortex and nonadjacent cortical areas. This topic is undoubtedly intriguing, justifying further research in the field. This review also discusses the benefits these patients can obtain from neuromodulation therapy addressed to the central nervous system and the importance of individual neurophysiological assessment in designing rehabilitation therapy for children with birth motor disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.