Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077732›Full record

ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2024

Dose optimization in newborn abdominal radiography: Assessing the added value of additional filtration on radiation dose and image quality using an anthropomorphic phantom.

Annie-Lyne Petit, Rabih Alwan, Julien Behr, Paul Calame, Marion Lenoir, Hubert Ducou le Pointe, Éric Delabrousse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annie-Lyne PetitDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Rabih AlwanDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Julien BehrDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Paul CalameDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Marion LenoirDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Hubert Ducou le PointeDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Paris, France.
Éric DelabrousseDepartment of Radiology, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abdominal radiographs remain useful in newborns. Given the high radiation sensitivity of this population, it is necessary to optimize acquisition techniques to minimize radiation exposure. Objective: Evaluate the effects of three additional filtrations on radiation dose and image quality in abdominal X-rays of newborns using an anthropomorphic phantom. Material and method: Abdominal radiographs of an anthropomorphic newborn phantom were performed using acquisition parameters ranging from 55 to 70 kV and from 0.4 to 2.5 mAs, without and with three different additional filtrations: 0.1 mm copper (Cu) + 1 mm aluminum (Al), 0.2 mm copper + 1 mm aluminum, and 2 mm aluminum. For each X-ray the dose area product (DAP) was measured, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated, and image quality (IQ) was evaluated by two blinded radiologists using the absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) method. Results: Adding an additional filtration resulted in a significant reduction in DAP, with a decrease of 42% using 2 mm Al filtration, 65% with 0.1 mm Cu + 1 mm Al filtration, and 78% with 0.2 mm Cu + 1 mm Al filtration ( Conclusion: Adding a 2 mm Al additional filtration for abdominal radiographs in newborns can significantly reduce the radiation dose without causing a significant decrease in image quality.

Indexed as

Abdominal radiographyAdditional filtrationDose reductionImage qualityNewbornPhantom

Identifiers

PMID39077732
PMCPMC11265153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.