ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
Role of Vector Flow Mapping in Evaluating Left Ventricular Diastolic Flow Dynamics in Patients Who Underwent Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement: Hemodynamics in Valve Surgery.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Intracardiac flow dynamics in mitral regurgitation: state of the art.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Posterior Leaflet Prolapse, Anterior Leaflet Prolapse, and Bileaflet Prolapse.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mitral valve (MV) morphology after MV repair affects postoperative left ventricular (LV) blood flow pattern and long-term cardiac function. Pilot data suggest that LV diastolic vortex flow pattern changes after operation, but specific quantifiers remain unknown. We aimed to explore the role of vector flow mapping (VFM) in LV diastolic vortex flow pattern in patients who underwent MV repair. Methods: A total of 70 patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation were consecutively enrolled and 30 age- and gender-matched controls were recruited. 50 Patients who underwent MV repair were eventually included in our study. LV average energy loss (EL-AVE) during diastole was measured in the MV repair group by VFM one week before and one month after the operation, and compared with that of controls using one-way analysis of variance. The effect of surgical techniques and the extension of leaflet degeneration on postoperative EL-AVE were analyzed using muti-way analysis of variance, and patients were categorized into a resection subgroup (n = 29) and a non-resection subgroup (n = 21). Results: The EL-AVE one month after operation in the MV repair group was decreased ( Conclusions: VFM can be used to evaluate the diastolic blood flow pattern of LV after MV repair, and to observe the changes of LV blood flow pattern caused by different surgical techniques. VFM may be a potential new hemodynamic evaluation method after MV repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.