Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077716›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022

Are Medicare Funded Multidisciplinary Care Policies Being Claimed in accordance to Rehabilitation Needs in Patients with Stroke?

David A Snowdon, David Ung, Taya A Collyer, Natasha A Lannin, Monique F Kilkenny, Amanda G Thrift, Vijaya Sundararajan, Dominique A Cadilhac, Nadine E Andrew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David A SnowdonDepartment of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, and National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, 3199 Frankston, Australia.
David UngDepartment of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, and National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, 3199 Frankston, Australia.
Taya A CollyerDepartment of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, and National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, 3199 Frankston, Australia.
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, 3004 Melbourne, Australia.
Monique F KilkennyStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, 3168 Clayton, Australia.
Amanda G ThriftStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, 3168 Clayton, Australia.
Vijaya SundararajanDepartment of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 3086 Bundoora, Australia.
Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, 3168 Clayton, Australia.
Nadine E AndrewDepartment of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, and National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, 3199 Frankston, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Australian Primary Care Practitioners are incentivised through Medicare funded policies to provide chronic disease management and facilitate multidisciplinary care. Little is known about how these policies are claimed in the long-term management of stroke. The objective of this study was to describe the use of funded primary care policies for people with stroke by impairment status. Methods: Linked Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (2010-2014) and Medicare data from adults with 90-180 days post-stroke EQ-5D health status survey data and admitted to one of 26 participating Australian hospitals were analysed. Medicare item claims for Primary Care Practitioner led chronic disease management and multidisciplinary care coordination policies, during the 18 months following stroke are described. Registrants were classified into impairment groups using their EQ-5D dimension responses through Latent Class Analysis. Associations between impairment and use of relevant primary care policies were explored using multivariable regression. Results: 5432 registrants were included (median age 74 years, 44% female, 86% ischaemic), 39% had a chronic disease management claim and 39% a multidisciplinary care coordination claim. Three latent classes emerged representing minimal, moderate and severe impairment. Compared to minimal, those with severe impairment were least likely to receive chronic disease management (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 0.61, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.49, 0.75) but were most likely to receive multidisciplinary care coordination. Podiatry was the commonest allied health service prescribed, regardless of impairment. Conclusions: Less than half of people living with stroke had a claim for primary care initiated chronic disease management, with mixed access for those with severe impairments.

Indexed as

epidemiologyprimary health carereferral and consultationsecondary preventionstroke

Identifiers

PMID39077716
PMCPMC11262366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.