ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
Performance of the Newly Proposed Peguero-Lo Presti Criterion in Adults with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The classic electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria have been applied to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) screening but have low sensitivity. Recently, the newly proposed Peguero-Lo Presti criterion has been proven to be more sensitive in detecting LVH in patients with hypertension than several current ECG criteria. The diagnostic value of the Peguero-Lo Presti criterion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients has not been fully evaluated. This study aims to test whether the new Peguero-Lo Presti criterion can improve the diagnostic performance in patients with HCM. Methods: This study included HCM patients and sex-and age-matched healthy control subjects. The diagnostic performance of the Peguero-Lo Presti criterion was evaluated along with the Sokolow-Lyon criterion, Cornell criterion, and total 12-lead voltage criterion. Results: Overall, 63 HCM patients and 63 controls were enrolled. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of Peguero-Lo Presti criterion were 74.6%, 73.0% and 76.2%, respectively. The Peguero-Lo Presti criterion had the highest sensitivity, while the Cornell criterion and Sokolow-Lyon criterion had the highest specificity (96.8%). The area under the curve (AUC) showed that the Peguero-Lo Presti criterion was 0.809 (95% CI, 0.730-0.874; Conclusions: The Peguero-Lo Presti criterion provides high sensitivity for ECG diagnosis of HCM patients and can be considered when applicable but this needs to be verified in a larger population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.