Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077700›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022

Coronary Artery Disease and Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Aakash Garg, Suleman Ilyas, Michael Cryer, J Dawn Abbott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aakash GargDivision of Cardiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Suleman IlyasDivision of Cardiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Michael CryerDivision of Cardiology, Tucson Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA.
J Dawn AbbottDivision of Cardiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and aortic stenosis share similar risk factors and underlying pathophysiology. Up to half of the patient population undergoing work-up for aortic valve replacement have underlying CAD, which can affect outcomes in patients with more severe disease. As the indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have expanded to intermediate and now low risk patients, the optimal management of CAD in this patient population still needs to be determined. This includes both pre-TAVR evaluation for CAD as well as indications for revascularization in patients undergoing TAVR. There is also limited data on coronary interventions after TAVR, including the incidence, feasibility and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after TAVR. This review provides an updated report of the current literature on CAD in TAVR patients, focusing on its prevalence, impact on outcomes, timing of revascularization and potential challenges with coronary interventions post-TAVR.

Indexed as

aortic stenosiscoronary artery diseasepercutaneous coronary interventiontranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID39077700
PMCPMC11262379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.