ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
Efficacy of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Acute Systolic Heart Failure.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect Modification by Acute Coronary Syndrome Prevalence on Non-Invasive Ventilation Efficacy in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute systolic heart failure (ASHF) is one of the most serious complications of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and increases the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes. It remains unclear whether the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) could improve symptoms and reduce mortality in patients with ASHF derived from ACS. Methods: Data on biological, clinical, and demographic factors, as well as therapy data, were collected from patients with ASHF in the cardiac department. A total of 1257 ACS patients with ASHF were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The control group received standard oxygen therapy. The comparison group consisted of those who underwent NIV as part of their immediate care. During hospitalization and at follow-up, information on both groups was systematically compared. Results: In comparison with the control group, mean 24-hour urine output was found to be significantly higher in the NIV group. A significant reduction in the duration of symptoms was observed among patients in the NIV group from the time of admission until relief of dyspnea. Heart rate, C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was also improved, compared with those in the control group. The NIV group was found to have a higher survival rate. NIV was independently related to all-cause mortality in 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.674; Conclusions: Our study shows that NIV, as compared with standard oxygen therapy, has a beneficial impact on heart rate, metabolic balance, and relief of dyspnea in ACS patients with ASHF which results in reduced intubation rate, duration of in-hospital stay, and 1-year mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.