Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077679›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2024

An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok.

Melanie Shackleford, Anna Horvath, Mayra Repetto, Andrea Thi, Rory Twells, Maggie Sanders, Stephanie Fernandez, Dale Netski, Kavita Batra, Nadia Gomez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melanie ShacklefordKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Anna HorvathKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Mayra RepettoKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Andrea ThiKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Rory TwellsKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Maggie SandersKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Stephanie FernandezKirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Shackleford, Horvath, Repetto, Thi, Twells, Sanders, and Fernandez).
Dale NetskiDepartment of Medical Education, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Netski and Batra).
Kavita BatraDepartment of Medical Education, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Netski and Batra).
Nadia GomezDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Gomez and Free).
Leanne FreeDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Gomez and Free).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: TikTok has increasingly become a source of information about reproductive health. Patients seeking health information about oral contraception on TikTok may be influenced by videos containing misinformation or biased information. Objective: This social media infodemiological study aims to provide a descriptive content analysis of the quality and reliability of oral contraceptive health information on TikTok. Study Design: Researchers screened 1,000 TikTok videos from December 2022 to March 2023 retrieved under various search terms related to oral contraceptives. Data, including engagement metrics such as views, likes, comments, saves, and shares, were recorded. Video content including contraceptive methods discussed, efficacy, tolerability, and side effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently used a modified DISCERN criteria and Global Quality Scale (GQS) to assess the quality and reliability of information for each video. Results: Five hundred seventy-four videos were analyzed after applying exclusion criteria. Videos had a median length of 27 seconds (Q1=13sec, Q3=57sec) and received a median of 35,000 total views (Q1=4856 views, Q3=411,400 views) and 166 views per day (Q1=28 views per day, Q3=2021 views per day). Video creators were 83.3% female and 58.7% white. The mean modified DISCERN score was 1.63 (SD=1.06) and the mean GQS score was 2.28 (SD=1.37). Video creators were 83.3% female and 58.7% white. The mean modified DISCERN score was 1.63 (SD=1.06) and the mean GQS score was 2.28 (SD=1.37). The most common topic discussed in the videos was the effects of contraception. Healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN and GQS scores ( Conclusion: TikTok videos related to oral contraceptive health had low quality and reliability of information. The majority of videos were made by non-healthcare providers, and the most common topic discussed was the effects of contraception. Videos made by healthcare professionals contained more reliable contraceptive information, but received less engagement than videos made by non-healthcare professionals. Healthcare providers should consider the prevalence of poor-quality information about oral contraceptives on social media when counseling and educating patients about reproductive health.

Indexed as

adolescentbirth controlcontraceptioncontraceptive pillinfodemiologymisinformationonline contentoral contraceptivesreproductive healthsex educationsocial mediasocial media analytics

Identifiers

PMID39077679
PMCPMC11284445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.