Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077677›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2024

TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how?

Angelo Iossa, Giovanni Traumueller Tamagnini, Francesco De Angelis, Alessandra Micalizzi, Giulio Lelli, Giuseppe Cavallaro

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07337603 (The Effect Of Trans-Anbdominal Pre-Peritoneal), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07337603 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Trans-Anbdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) And Total Extra-Peritoneal (TEP) Procedures on Intraocular Pressure in Laparoscopıc Inguinal Hernia Repair :A Procspective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsGroin Hernia, Intraocular PressureArmsPreoperative Intraocular Pressure, Postoperative Intraocular Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angelo IossaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.
Giovanni Traumueller TamagniniDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.
Francesco De AngelisDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.
Alessandra MicalizziDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.
Giulio LelliDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.
Giuseppe CavallaroDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groin hernia repair is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons. The open mesh technique generally represents the main technique for an inguinal repair, but a different approach is often required. Laparoscopy was found to be the answer to minimizing the impact of the preperitoneal open techniques described by Nyhus and Stoppa. The introduction of the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) in the early 1990s started a new chapter in groin hernia surgery. The minimally invasive techniques vs. open mesh, and then one against the other, soon became a hot topic among abdominal wall surgeons. With time, the number of procedures and indications increased and are still increasing. This review aims to provide an overview of the two main laparoscopic techniques for groin hernia repair, answering the following questions: Who should perform them? What is the learning curve required to minimize complications and optimize operative time? When is a minimally invasive approach indicated, and which one (both in elective and in emergency setting)? How are they performed? The standard techniques have been described in detail, and personal observations from an abdominal wall surgery referral center were added. The main reviews from the early 2000s up to date, which compared the techniques, were analyzed, and the results reported, confirming the comparable safety and efficacy of both these techniques.

Indexed as

laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia surgerylaparoscopic groin hernia repairreview of literatureTAPPTEP

Identifiers

PMID39077677
PMCPMC11284065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.